William Adams wrote:
> Things which CSS font selection doesn't encompass:
> optical size (as opposed to physical --- I left this out of my list)
> font features such as swash and contextual ligatures
> They do have a nice numbering scheme for weight though (100--900)
> which could be adapted --- there's no reason this couldn't be a
> superset of CSS --- that's a very good idea and also use the
> numbering scheme for widths.
Thank you for this.
So let me ask a question that William already hints at.
Could the 'Next Font Selection Scheme' be a superset of CSS?