LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:32:29 +0930
Content-Disposition: inline
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (24 lines)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Joseph Wright
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I've been giving a little thought to how I might implement something
> like siunitx in expl3.  An initial assessment points to two support
> packages: array and amstext.  Both strike me as pretty much essential
> for LaTeX3, so I wondered if it is likely that either functionality
> might make it into the new kernel?

Good question :)
I suspect the underlying interface to tabular material will remain
rather similar. (Although I'd like to write a better *user* interface,
one day.)

Either way, I can't see anything happening in the near future since
porting array would be a big job and maths is all rather up in the air
at the moment. (breqn is taking form but it's very early days yet;
it's current incarnation on CTAN is probably the last that *won't* use
the expl3 bundle, though.)

But there's no problem, of course, using their "LaTeX2e" macros in your package.

W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2