LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:42:28 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: boolean expressions in ExplSyntaxNames
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From: Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (8 lines) 
On 20/09/2010 09:30, Will Robertson wrote:
> I'm not against dropping \ExplSyntaxNames(On/Off). My only perceived benefit for them is that package authors can use them inside their own packages without having to deal with any spaces->ignored issue. But something like \ExplObeySpaces(On/Off) deals with this nicely.

Well, I think that you have to 'get used to it'. There are good reasons 
for the approach to spaces we've taken.
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2