Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:44:37 +0200
<[log in to unmask]
> (Jonathan Fine's message of "Fri, 21
Apr 2017 17:32:35 +0100")
Jonathan Fine <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Early on, LaTeX sets basic character codes. Perhaps if, at the same
> time, it also executed
> \expandafter\let\expandafter<\string <
> then Benedikt 's problem would go way. Or could more easily be solved.
> I don't see any fundamental reason why this would not work.
I did not expect this suggestion from the author of ActiveTeX.
ERROR: Missing = inserted for \ifnum.
--- TeX said ---
<to be read again>
3 good\else bad\fi}
--- HELP ---
From the .log file...
I was expecting to see `<', `=', or `>'. Didn't.
Were you thinking of