LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 21:04:39 +0930
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: \cs:c
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (23 lines)
On 08/09/2008, at 8:52 PM, Will Robertson wrote:

> On 08/09/2008, at 8:43 PM, Morten Høgholm wrote:
>> There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe).
> Ah, this is undocumented.
> I'll add something somewhere.

Looking closer, I see:

\def_new:Npn \use:c #1{\cs:w #1\cs_end:}
\def_new:Npn \cs_use:c #1 { \cs:w#1\cs_end: }

These two functions are used in approximately equal number throughout  
expl3 and the xpackages.

Can I deprecate one of these (i.e., do a search'n'replace across the  
board) to fix this inconsistency? I guess if I had to choose one,  
\cs_use:c would be my pick.