LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:53:11 +0930
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: tlp type
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (19 lines) 
On 10/09/2008, at 12:43 AM, Joseph Wright wrote:

> Will Robertson wrote:
>>
>> \def:Npn \store_something: {Something}
>>
>> (I prefer it without the "0" argument spec.)
>>
>
> I was wondering about this.  For macros with no arguments, I was
> thinking :NNn has the advantage that the second N is "seen", whereas  
> Npn
> has an invisible p argument.

Yeah; if people start using "\def:NNn 0" a lot, I'd be pretty tempted  
to define a \def:Nn variant...

W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2