David Carlisle writes:
> that is marked up in XML. It is true, that especially for mathematics,
> there is not (yet?) a realistic authoring environment that produces
> mathematics marked up to an XML dtd.
i know it won't suit the high-falutin' 20th century mathematicians
amongst us, but for the great unwashed MathType is perfectly
plausible. indeed
returning to Hans:
>The *ML movements are currently pretty orthogonal to what TeX can offer:
>The *ML offer fast, simple typesetting, suitable for WWW and simpler types
> of printing.
its a shame we don't have a competition for "the most inaccurate and
ill-informed remarks made on latex-l each month".
sebastian "low blood pressure" rahtz