Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:03:43 +1030 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 20/10/2008, at 6:12 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:
> Reading through l3basics, I see that \def_test_function_new:npn
> creates
> FT variants of the tests as well as TF, T and F ones. However, the FT
> variant doesn't get mentioned anywhere for the tests created. Is this
> needed, and if so shouldn't it be mentioned.
I noticed that recently too. I think it would be better to remove that
variant in the expl3 syntax, since it doesn't seem like it adds much
of importance but it adds a bit of obfuscation. I mean, if you're used
to true/false code to usually be {...true...}{...false...} then
switching that every now and then and only indicating it by FT instead
of TF is kinda hard to spot.
Anyone else have additional thoughts?
W
|
|
|