LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Modules
From: Richard Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:53:00 +1000
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (10 lines)
Philip Taylor (RHBNC) writes:
 > How can that work?  Assuming that (e.g.) "\newcommand" is macro ->
 > {... \def ...}, then without a LaTeX equivalent of PostScript's
 > "bind", you still need access to "\def"; and if "\newcommand" is
 > macro -> {... \someconcealedversionofdef ...}, then the user can
 > use "\someconcealedversionofdef" :-(

Stick an @ in the name of the renamed \def.  That's enough to stop
most people.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2