LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:42:28 -0400
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
l3doc: \tn vs. \cs
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From:
"Joel C. Salomon" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
The intent of \tn seems to be providing a \cs-like macro that puts its
argument in a different index section for TeX/LaTeX2e commands (though
this is not implemented, or at least not working, at the moment).

How relevant is this, outside the l3 project itself?  Is there any
real reason for me to make this distinction in xpeek?

—Joel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2