 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (iPad Mail 7B367) |
| Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-716614527 |
| Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 00:22:55 +1030 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
(Sent quickly. Please excuse brevity.)
On 03/10/2010, at 11:41 PM, Philipp Stephani <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Am 03.10.2010 um 14:02 schrieb David Perry:
>
>> If I omit the option, or use 'xetex' in place of 'hypertex' or use the driverfallback option, I get:
>>
>> ! Undefined control sequence.
>> \str_if_eq_p:nn #1#2->\tex_ifnum:D \pdf_strcmp:D
>> {\etex_unexpanded:D {#1}}{\...
>> l.479 ...p:w \cs_set_nopar:cpn \cs_set_nopar:Npn
>>
>> I fixed the missing commas but that made no difference.
>
> Looks like an expl3 problem: \pdf_strcmp:D is pdfTeX's \pdfstrcmp, which might be nonexistent or available under a different name in XeTeX. This *might* get fixed by updating expl3; otherwise write to the LaTeX list ([log in to unmask], I've put it on CC).
I think I fixed this coincidentally earlier today. The update will roll out in a timely fashion.
You should be able to work around this problem by writing
\let\pdfstrcmp\strcmp
early in your preamble. If I've got this right, that is — I'm not in front of the code right now.
Hope this helps,
W
|
|
|
