LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:53:49 +0930
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-487689715; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (710 bytes) , smime.p7s (2446 bytes)
On 04/08/2009, at 6:19 PM, Robin Fairbairns wrote:

> so, apart from the suspicion that this makes _every_ syntax  
> "hungarian",
> i'm completely lost.
>
> what _do_ you mean, "hungarian"?  do hungarians spend a lot of time
> lying down (_) or stumbling upright (:)?

:) Sorry 'bout that.
Wikipedia has a good quote: "Hungarian notation is a naming convention  
in computer programming, in which the name of a variable indicates its  
type or intended use".

     \toks_set:Nx \l_frank_toks { ... }

By requiring "toks" in the function name and in the variable name, our  
brains know we're using the right method on the right datatype. TeX  
doesn't (sometimes) care, of course; it's just a crutch for us  
fallible humans.

Will



ATOM RSS1 RSS2