LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (iPad Mail 8L1)
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:02:39 +0930
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: \msg_four_spaces:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-980631610
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (717 bytes) , text/html (1614 bytes) 
(Sent quickly. Please excuse brevity.)

On 19/09/2011, at 11:51 PM, Bruno Le Floch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> Oh yes, `\ \ \ \ ` would be pretty good. (My brain thought they'd be
>> concatenated for some reason and I didn't try it. Distracted by other work,
>> I suppose.)
> 
> They're actually lost nowhere (e.g., not even after unfinished f-expansion)

Yeah, silly me. 

> 
>> I'm probably happy to leave things as they are for now. In fact, any sort of
>> "indent" function would be better if it respected the line-wrapping routine
>> and that's more work than it's worth right now. I'll table this thought in
>> the Github wiki.
> 
> Do you mean \msg_indent:n {<text to indent that may be line-wrapped>} ?

Aye :-)

W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2