LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:01:00 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Lars Hellström <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
At 14.24 +0100 2001-12-10, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>2. \protect has no effect on the working/non-working state of \verb.
>when lamport says in his manual that you can't use \verb in the
>argument of a command, he actually means what he says.

While we're at \verb anyway, did anyone [with actual familiarity of
extending TeX] investigate any further the feasibility of the mechanism
that I sketched in my mail to this list of 13 Jun 2001?

Although the particular problem that motivated that suggestion was
language-tagging in multilingual documents, I did remark that one could
just as well use it to implement a \verb command that _would_ work in the
arguments of commands. (This is of course not practically possible in a
non-extended TeX.)

Lars Hellström

ATOM RSS1 RSS2