LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:10:42 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<13943.39896.480540.616437@srahtz>
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
At 11:39 +0000 1998/12/16, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>Hans Aberg writes:
> > But it seems a bad thing to tie an extension of TeX to such a commercial
> > product (like PS/PDF).
>
>we are all agog to hear about the free chip you use to run TeX, the
>free printer you use, or even the free paper you print on. Fancy tying
>TeX to the commercial world of paper and film suppliers! what *was*
>Don thinking of?

It is the lack of pluralism on the market: So for example, I am not sure
you have noticed, but ther is more than one coomercial supplier of papers,
but there is just one company asking licence fees for PS/PDF and developing
that standard.

These problems are for real in the software world: In the past, i think it
existed with FORTRAN, and of course still today with UNIX, which is owned
by Bell labs, I think.

  Hans Aberg
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
                  * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
                  * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2