LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:49:42 +0930
text/plain (29 lines)
On 05/09/2009, at 11:10 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:

> Is there a chance, that this could happen to xpackages as well?
> Then module `latex3' of latex-tds would become obsolete.

Your wish is my command :)
I'll see what I can do this afternoon.

> BTW:
> contains a duplicate:
>     4619  06-02-09 02:16   source/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx
>     4619  06-02-09 02:16   tex/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx
> Is there a reason for the second one? It looks misplaced among
> the .sty files.

It needs to be there, but I don't know if it NEEDS to be there. Some  
historical code in l3doc (\includeltpatch) contains \input{l3vers.dtx}  
in order to check the distribution date against a (nonexistent so far)  
patch file.

Without knowing how the team has dealt with these patch files in the  
past, nor whether we'll use them again in the future, I've just left  
the code as is. But at this stage it's not being used.