LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:17:12 +1030
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Back to "token list" nomenclature; was Re: \tlist_if_eq:nn
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (16 lines) 
On 01/01/2009, at 11:34 PM, Arno Trautmann wrote:

> But then I would say \catcode =12 to everything else, excluding only \
> and maybe {} for grouping. Maybe even the meaning of % and \% could be
> interchanged: % in normal Text and \% as comment?
> Or is that too much changed?…

I'd definitely like to explore ideas like this.
I've vaguely thought in the past what it would take to get {} braces  
as having  catcode other. I'm not sure it's feasible but I think it  
would sure be nice :)

At this stage, however, we can just leave it as vague plans...

Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2