LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:52:07 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (35 lines)
David Kastrup writes:

 > >  > What is your take?  I find it clearly unsatisfactory to have LaTeX
 > >  > eat up save stack for newly defined labels like that at the end of
 > >  > the document.
 > >
 > > well, you seem to be the first person getting into trouble with this,
 > 
 > I doubt it.  From ltxref.dtx:

on labels I meant, but I was more or less joking, yes this isn't something
that should stay, no question

 > So obviously somebody ran into this problem before.  But only half of it
 > got fixed.

yes I think I remember that one ...  huge bibliographies being processed

 > > I don't really mind either of the three solutions (provided none of the
 > > kills the regression tests for 2e) but personally I would simply drop the
 > > group unless somebody can give me a good reason why it could be needed in
 > > a certain situation.
 > 
 > For restoring \@newl@bel's definition afterwards.  Don't ask me why it
 > could be needed.

it could not could it? a) where? in a final OR? and b) to what purpose with
auxfiles closed.

I mean yes, that would be one of those things that would be different but I'm
not even prepared to call that a sideeffect unless somebody shows me an
existing application

frank

ATOM RSS1 RSS2