## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

 Options: Use Classic View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

 Re: \clist_gput_right:Nx? Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]> Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:27:45 +0930 text/plain (29 lines) On 07/09/2008, at 11:14 PM, Joseph Wright wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason expl3 has > > \clist_put_right:Nx > \clist_put_left:Nx > > but no > > \clist_gput_right:Nx > \clist_gput_left:Nx > > when the other (non-expanded) variants are all available as gpu and > put > variations? As it stands, I have to use \clist_put_right:Nx for a > global list: not good. I agree. l3seq and l3tlp exhibit similar inconsistencies. Since it's hardly any extra code to include in the base package, I'd argue for extending most of these functions to support as many variants as reasonably possible -- and to be consistent between modules, as well. I've got to run now, but I'll take a look at fleshing these out over the next couple of days. Will