LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Behaviour of \SplitArgument with missing input
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 May 2013 08:42:33 +0930
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
(Sent from my phone.) 

On 30/04/2013, at 11:36 PM, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> This
> test would then be a code level equivalent of \IfNoValue(TF).
> 
> This seems to make some sense to me

I like this too if just as syntactic sugar. Perhaps the test would be sensibly named \xparse_if_no_value:nTF to avoid mixing up the module names? 

W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2