On 7/11/14, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 00:20, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
>> should change the precedence of juxtaposition-as-multiplication from
>> what it currently is (the tightest) to being the same as
>> multiplication. In other words, juxtaposition would behave exactly
>> identically to adding an asterisk.
> To be clear, continue to allow
> 2x + 1
> 2pt + 3cm
> but with
> 2x^2 + 2 = 2*(x^2) + 2
> so for your example 25pc^2 requiring braces (0.25pc)^2?
>> Would that make sense? Am I missing something crucial (probably... I
>> didn't realize when allowing juxtaposition what a mess I was
> Seems OK to me (if I've understood correctly).
Yes you did. Cf my other email: how should the change happen?