LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:31:47 +0930
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: The nature of popping from an empty sequence
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (13 lines) 
On 15/04/2011, at 9:52 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:

>>> * These should probably be consistent.
>>> * I think returning a quark is dangerous in case of sloppy package
>>> authors.
> 
> From the seq point of view, I like the idea of \seq_pop:NNF, with a
> \seq_pop:NN variant for an expl3-provided error.

We seem to be in large agreement on this particular point (speak up if not), so let's pencil it in to be incorporated into the revisions to seq.

-- Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2