 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:35:09 +0100 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8BIT |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Chris Rowley wrote:
> > Here's a fix for xo-new.dtx, but I am still not sure wether the fixing
> > is done in the right place at all.
>
> Well one good test is: does it look tight now?
Yes, it looks right. But what is making me think is, that the original
calculations seem right. It appears, that the floatbox-origin is shifted
somewhere. So maybe it is really something in the float-setup or
float-boxing that is wrong, and my fix is just a work-around.
Especially, as the offset seems to depend on the spancnt of the float,
something that is not used in this part of xo-new.
I still have some trouble tracing the float-placement, so I have not found
anything there, that looks wrong. So that's what I meant with "the right
place".
Björn
--
Bjoern Pedersen Lichtenbergstr.1
Technische Universitaet Muenchen D-85747 Garching
ZBE Instrumentierung FRM-II
Tel. + 49 89 289-14707 Fax -14666
|
|
|
