'ello. :)

 > The team intend to modify the existing \<thing>_case:nnn functions,
 > renaming the last argument as 'F'. This reflects the fact that this
 > final argument is used only when the test case (<thing>-dependent) is
 > logically false, and follows the approach used elsewhere.

 From a Futurama episode, "I have no strong feelings one way or the 
other." :)

 > At the same time, we intend to introduce \<thing>_case:nn, where
 > there is no false branch (i.e. where 'do nothing' is the appropriate
 > action).

I 100% support this effort. :) I just prefer "default branch" or "else 
branch" instead of "false branch".

Ouch, too much branches. :)

All the best,

Paulo


Em 07-07-2013 13:03, Joseph Wright escreveu:
> Hello all,
>
> The team intend to modify the existing \<thing>_case:nnn functions,
> renaming the last argument as 'F'. This reflects the fact that this
> final argument is used only when the test case (<thing>-dependent) is
> logically false, and follows the approach used elsewhere. At the same
> time, we intend to introduce \<thing>_case:nn, where there is no false
> branch (i.e. where 'do nothing' is the appropriate action).
> --
> Joseph Wright
>