LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:24:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 01 Dec 2001 06:32:35 -0200." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (16 lines)
> I never tested anything like this, but I think it works if you \protect
> the inner declaration like
>
> \footnote{foo  \protect{\foo{foo}} foo}

it's bad enough using the latex list for non-latex-research issues,
but to post clueless rubbish to it is worse still.

for the record:
1. \protect protects the next token (in your case "{"); to protect
\foo, say \protect\foo, with no braces around it.

2. \protect has no effect on the working/non-working state of \verb.
when lamport says in his manual that you can't use \verb in the
argument of a command, he actually means what he says.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2