LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: latex and unicode-letters
From: Karl Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:23:04 GMT
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines) 
    saying words to the effect 'You better have a matching set of files'.

I agree.  And my point is that a user cannot know if the files are in
fact "matching" unless you specify actual information about the files
used to build.  A random version string like "7.0.0" is not enough to
technically verify.  A checksum (ideal), a file size (good enough in
practice), something that is specific to the actual content is needed.
Otherwise it's just a guess.

Regarding the name: I like unicode-letters.def.

thanks,
karl

ATOM RSS1 RSS2