LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:13:44 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: \cs:c
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From: Morten Høgholm <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (12 lines)
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Another quesition, I'm afraid.  In the main, I get the impression :w
> macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one.
> However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c
> (= \@nameuse).  I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there
> a reason for avoiding this?

There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe).