LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:27:23 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From: Javier Bezos <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <l03102802b95268e9f976@[]>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)

>> That makes sense, but afaik the LPPL doesn't say that. However,
>> I think a clear distinction should be made between the LPPL
>> and the CTAN policy. CTAN won't accept a class/package whose
>> name clashes with the name of an existing class/package, except
>> if the author cannot be reached, etc.
> Is that actual CTAN policy, or you just thinking loud?

Just thinking aloud (not only here, but in the rest
of the post, too).